Comic Relief : (

 Imagine a world where some of the occupants are rich – they own beautiful houses, drive around in sumptuous cars, wear clothes cut from the finest materials, eat food grown in perfect conditions – and some of the occupants are desperately poor – they live in shacks made from cardboard and corrugated iron, walk miles to fetch water, wear rags and eat what they can find. This is our world; and to resolve this dreadful inequality, the rich allocate one day a year to carry out all manner of ridiculous and bizarre activities, for which, other rich people give them money, so that they in turn can donate it to the needy. Sounds idiotic doesn’t it? That’s because it is.


While some people treat Comic Relief like Christmas Day, I have never enjoyed it. Even as a child I remember thinking it slightly barmy and, as I’ve aged, the faintly absurd has morphed into the generally repulsive. I find the whole charade in bad taste and I hope in years to come that I’ll be proven right and will be able to look back with the same cringing realisation I get from watching old racist films (which I do all the time). If you are about to stop reading in protest, UNDERSTAND THIS: I don’t think Comic Relief is a bad thing – I think it does a lot of good. I only dislike the manner in which it achieves the good.


They say the ends always justify the means and maybe this is true, but to me, Comic Relief signifies a purposeful detachment from the horrible realism of the world. We, the Comic Relief viewers, are so far removed from the grim realities of poverty, famine, genocide, AIDS etc, and also ignorant to the causes of such atrocities, that we can only be forced to confront images of pot bellied African children dying of malnutrition if they are neatly spliced between jokes and banter.


We have grown spineless and ignorant – throwing out current affairs in favour of celebrity gossip. We have been raised to know only joy and, as such, we refuse unhappiness. Today’s society is certainly better and fairer than those preceding it, but, through it’s infinite nurturing, it has alienated us from the truly desperate – severed and hidden the ugly. The closest most of us now get to poverty is buying The Big Issue! Wealth has made us indifferent and unaware of real problems, distracting us with the superfluous: designer sunglasses, 5 a day, iTunes, facebook updates, anti wrinkling cream . . . But, recent economic events have shaken our belief in the unfaltering mechanics of our society and, whatsmore, given us a taste of how it feels to be on the receiving end of a greedy and aloof elite.


The bankers (Yes I will mention them in everything I write – it’s my blog and I’ll write what I want to.) washed their hands and exited the shit stink with little but a stray piece of toilet paper trailing from their shoes, leaving the rest of us to clean up the mess. This, in many ways, could be likened to our exit from colonial legacies and exploitation; the havoc we caused – which in many places, continues to this day – and the injustice of our unscathed departure, should draw dramatic parallels with recent history and coax the question from our hearts: “How must those people feel about us?” and as a corollary, “What can we do to make things right?”


If the banking sector had the prescience of mind to do anything other than claw and grab at the last few dollars flapping in the breeze, they would have realised that they could not only have redeemed themselves, but also resurrected our collective outlook. But they didn’t. Fred Goodwin elected to keep his annual £700,000+ retirement fund and, no doubt, many others have scuttled away with their swag bags – which is exactly what you expect from men who have dedicated their existence to chasing around money like well suited idiot savants.


So, with the possibility of a ‘second coming’ nigh becoming an apocalypse (but with more horseman), we must band together, not to vilify the wrongdoers, but to recognise the error of our ways and the ways of our ancestors, and use this turn in the zeitgeist as a catalyst to redress the balance. It’s time for a fairer society where people give out of duty and not to make themselves feel better. No longer can we remain ignorant to the struggles in faraway lands; no longer can we shy away from the unpleasant; no longer can we mask the world’s problems with comedy.





Filed under Current Affairs

3 responses to “Comic Relief : (

  1. cheggers139

    Why does famine have to be depressing?!!

  2. Paul Treg

    So you got a job as Gordon Browns advisor, nice work!

    I dont know mate. I dont know if what you write sits true with me – Of course parts do, but the blog itself is a bit idealistic.

    Its a bloody tough world, and I would love to fullfill my dreams of (in no particular order, or maybe a phsycologist would argue): raising a family, be healthy and have a good standard of living, eat well, and have a nice house etc.

    Now, for me to achieve these, I have to work 9-5, full time, study and constantly maintain the way i go about my life. This is for me to live in conditions the unfortunate africans dont have. I look after my ideals and what I want from my life, before I consider the worlds problems. This isn’t wholly down to a sense of priority, or perceived selfishness, but the fact that I can actually make a difference on a local scale, but I have literally no power to sort the worlds problems.

    I did donate a small sum of money to Comic Relief (all i could genuinely afford!) and I do care very much.
    However, I shall look after myself and those around me first. That is not unreasonable, surely?


  3. Bobby Robe and The Curious Incident of Global Warming Research Funding In The Night.

    The misery and suffering as seen on the mawkish Comic Relief is actually happening, right now, and yet we are still choosing to invest unimaginably large sums of money to reduce global warming. An issue that has the consensus of scientists agreement. The work of science, however, has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
    We could be investing billions in eliminating the fact that a child is orphaned by AIDS every 7 seconds but instead we cling to the reactionary and antihuman doctrines of outdated environmentalism and turn our backs to the cries of the dying and the starving and the diseased of our shared world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s