Visions of doom

Ashley left the office at 5pm on Friday and went out with some friends. They drank a lot, ate a kebab and went home late. Ashley moped about all Saturday with a hangover. On Sunday, Ashley went shopping for Christmas presents but ended up buying new shoes instead. Ashley ordered a takeaway on Sunday night and sat down to watch the final of the X-Factor. Olly should have won in Ashley’s opinion, as he had a greater stage presence, more of a fun attitude and was generally a livelier entertainer than Joe, although Joe did have a nice voice. Ashley woke up Monday morning to discover that Ryan Giggs won BBC Sports Personality of the Year. This was a surprise to Ashley, who admires the Manchester United veteran’s longevity and ability to stay at the peak of his game long after his prime, although felt that perhaps Andrew Strauss deserved to win it for his unsung triumph at the Ashes just months after the England side crumpled in the Caribbean. Ashley left the house and drove to a doctor’s appointment, running from the car park to the surgery through the rain. This was Ashley’s exercise for the week. Sat in the waiting room, Ashley realised in annoyance that the new shoes had got wet and dirty in the rain. Ashley was called into the doctor’s office for the results of the tests. It wasn’t good news. The doctor told Ashley that the results pointed to an illness that, if left untreated, would be fatal within a decade. The doctor stated that the illness was almost certainly caused by Ashley’s unhealthy lifestyle, although it was also possible that predetermined genetic factors could have played a part in its manifestation. The doctor explained that although there is no specific remedy for the illness, if Ashley could change and live a healthy lifestyle with plenty of exercise, the effects of the illness could be reversed.

Should Ashley . . .

A) Change for the better as the doctor suggested – join a gym, eat well, live healthily and continue to check in with the doctor; accept responsibility for past lifestyle choices, try to turn things around and hope the illness abates?

B) Make promises and plans to change, but keep putting them off because it seems so hard; live in hope that the illness is not as bad as the doctor predicted?

C) Ignore the doctor’s advice; Seek second opinions that reinforce the doctor’s suggestion that the illness is genetic and uncontrollable and then continue to live as before, until certain death in the near future?

Option A offers hope, option C doesn’t and option B seems depressingly pathetic. We would hope that Ashley chooses option A, although you probably couldn’t give a shit, because Ashley is an androgynous, make-believe character who is neither well developed nor appealing. Nevertheless, we should all care about Ashley’s fate, because despite the fact that Ashley is a faceless imaginary character and the unnamed malady equally fictitious, the tale is an allegory of our collective fates which isn’t faceless, unnamed or fictional.

Ashley, or at least the notion of Ashley as a potentially doomed human being, is every human being on earth; the decision he/she must make is in the hands of a clutch of representatives from governments around the world; the unnamed malady is climate change.

I can envisage our generation as old people of the future, and I can envisage the grandchildren and their questions.

“Grandma, why didn’t you or anyone in your generation do anything to stop global warming?”
“Well, when they were deciding what to do I was talking to my friend about the X-Factor – that was a show where people sang old songs like karaoke and if you liked them you phoned up and voted to keep them in – or, come to think of it, it might have been the other one . . . There was another one about dancing where newsreaders and soap actors danced the waltz and one with celebrities eating maggots in a jungle and umm, sorry, what were you asking about?”
“GLOBAL WARMING! Look around you. The water’s up to my knees you stupid bitch!”
Susan Boyle! SuBo, the papers called her and there was another one JedWard. Susan Boyle was from Britain’s Got Talent. That was a show where. . .”

Although spliced with humour to keep you from crying, it is a bleak vision. But most of my visions of the future are pretty bleak – especially if I appear in them as my future self, who is even more sardonic and miserable than my present self as a result of the ever nearing Armageddon.

Obviously politicians don’t have these visions or they wouldn’t behave with such staggering indifference when it comes to confronting the most pressing matter to face mankind. Or perhaps they do, but all their visions are of drug fuelled romps in the newly built chalets of the post Ice Age ski resorts of Bristol. Whatever the case may be, the fact that they aren’t all madly agreeing immutable treaties to stop the inevitable demise of the human race makes me want to weep into my cheap mass produced clothing, although I can’t for fear that the tears may damage them and the poor, low-land dwelling residents of the Bangladeshi factories may be wiped out before I can buy any more.

For all the belligerent rhetoric at Kyoto in ’97, essentially fuck all has changed and, what’s more, most people don’t care, or at least don’t realise the gravity of the situation. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), greenhouse gas emissions will need to peak and begin to decline with the next 20 years if the average global temperature rise is to be limited to 2C – a rise that, fingers crossed, shouldn’t provoke a massive catastrophe such as the halting of the gulf stream, which would instigate an Ice Age. If we are to manage this then developed countries need to agree an emissions cut of at least 25% by 2020.

Still, with Barack Obama’s hands tied by Congress and Senate and the hackers responsible for ‘Climategate’ identified as probable Russian secret service, it seems that, despite these dire warnings, it is quite possible that little more than well meaning rhetoric will come out of Copenhagen. We are still somnambulistically staggering towards our collective doom, with the hope that if we keep on ignoring the issue, option B will turn up trumps. Perhaps our only hope of raising awareness and making a change is a Climate Change reality TV show. Who would have thought that Simon Cowell would be mankind’s last hope? The visions get worse.




Filed under Current Affairs, Politics

6 responses to “Visions of doom

  1. cheggers

    I thought you said you would be splicing this with humour?

  2. Fevan

    Great read.

    Although I do want to kill myself. More so than usual.

  3. The staggering indifference is because we are on the brink of economy crippling legislation to tackle a problem we don’t fully understand and the science is most certainly not settled on.

    The “solutions” being proposed in Copenhagen right now are not designed to actually help anyone. As the documents leaked at the beginning of Copenhagen show, the developed world is effectively bribing the third world out of an industrial revolution. What is being argued now is just how big that bribe has to be.

    The main problem in raising awareness was demonstrated by ‘An Inconvenient Truth’ a documentary shown in schools around the US that was taken to court and proven to contain 9 scientific lies.

    Somnambulism, fine work 🙂

    This is not the light hearted badinage I signed up for. I’m going home.

  4. P Treg

    Mitch, you remind me of a computer geek worrying about the millennium bug, or an 80 year old worrying about dying of swine flu. There is a possible problem, but I think you should worry less!

    Q: How much will sea level rise in the next 20 years, if the ‘recently higher’ current rates of 1990-2006 continue?

    A: 5.6 CM’s.

    Yes, just over 2 inches….

    All this crap about 1.2 meters in 50 years is totally and utter gibberish, which in itself devalues the global warming theory.

    I believe that the world is getting warmer. I also believe that a vast number of scientific reasoning’s are totally inaccurate.

    I have many theories about climate change – I tend to provide theories that challenge the widely accepted scientist view.
    They range from reasonable arguments to wild theories, suitable only for airing after 8pints.

    I like to use simple examples, as im simple.

    Below is an example of one of my theories.
    This was born after 2 bottles of champagne last week, it’s sort of shit, but I like it:

    -You build a house with no internal walls and park a car in the centre of it with its engine off.
    -There is a permanent temperature of 20 oC outside.
    Q: After 6 months what will the temperature inside the house be?
    = 20 oC of course.

    -You now switch the engine of the car on, and it idles until the full tank of petrol runs out, which will be 48hours.
    Q: After 48hours of the car engine running, what will the temperature inside the house be?
    = 24 oC as a guess; it will have risen though.


    Q: After 6 months what will the temperature inside the house be?
    = I think it would be very close to 20 oC again.

    So, what caused the warming? Was it the chemical make-up of the atmosphere within the house, or was it the simple truth that we learnt in physics in year 7; the by-product of heat from the combustion of the fuel?

    People argue that when there is more CO2 in the atmosphere, temperatures are higher (taken from ice core samples) so therefore CO2 causes warming. Totally wrong in my view.

    When a greater amount of heat is present/generated on the earth, CO2 levels are or course going to be higher, as they are always present as by-product of heating events – volcanic activity/Driving a car, for example.

    Therefore, CO2 doesn’t create the global warming, the actual by-product of HEAT does.

    Have you ever heard a weatherforecaster say ”away from the cities, temperatues could drop further to around xx0c tonight”


  5. hamitchell

    Ah, it seems that some people do care after all.

    Cheggers: ATS.

    Bevan: I’m just glad to see that you are still among us, let alone reading thee words.

    Jew: A succinct summary of the frustrating political/scientific stalemate that prevents any progress.

    Paul: Your experiment with the car fails to account for solar activity and therefore ignores the fundamental principle of global warming – the ability of greenhouse gases such as CO2 to absorb and emit infra-red radiation. The process of heating you allude to is known as ‘urban heat island effect’.

    Also, I seem to remember that the main worry with the millennium bug was planes falling from the sky and cans of groceries not scanning at Tesco. Likewise, swine flu may wipe out a smattering of the old, but they have to die of something. Despite the scaremongering at the time, ultimately neither threatened to eradicate humanity.

    P.S I resent being depicted as an 80 year old computer geek. I am a young sprightly chap with scant regard for the intricacies of the technological revolution.

  6. P Treg

    I think there is only one way in which we can resolve our differences from this point mitchell.

    bring the baby oil when you come over on the 27th…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s